“I am not going to go into the past.” This single quote by Mark McGwire has become indicative of the now fleeting steroid era. McGwire’s contention, however, has not prevented writers and fans alike, from attaching steroid use or even existence in the steroid era, as black spots to the legacies of numerous players.
With the announcement that the Baltimore Orioles have hired Dan Duquette, the former Boston Red Sox general manager, as their general manager, I wonder if it is time to reevaluate the legacy of Duquette in Boston.
One of moves that looms largest in the minds of Boston fans, attached to the legacy of Dan Duquette, was unquestionably the decision to let a Boston icon and legend, Roger Clemens, leave the team via free agency. Now many of you see where I am going with my train of thought here, but the question remains, what role did steroids indirectly play in the legacy of Dan Duquette?
Roger Clemens was 34 at the beginning of his first season outside of Boston. At this age, a swift precipitous decline is not out of the minds of coaches and GMs. Clemens, however, was not destined for such a drop in production, instead he would accumulate a combined 53.6 wins above replacement player (WAR) rating and 162 total wins over 11 more seasons in the MLB, and earn 4 more Cy Young awards (to go along with the 3 he won in Boston). In short, Clemens could have been an ace at the top of the Red Sox rotation, and helped the team to many more victories (especially since he did most of his pitching damage in Toronto and as a Yankee, division rivals of the Red Sox, after leaving) for many more years, had Duquette resigned him following the ’96 season.
As news outlets across America have made you acutely aware, however, Roger Clemens has found himself mired in one of the bitterest battles of alleged steroid use. Would Duquette’s decision look as bad as it does if Clemens’ arm had tired or slowed down after the more than 498 innings that he threw in two seasons as a Blue Jay? Steroids, if he did use them (and let’s face it, I am not the only one who thinks he is as guilty as it gets), it would not be a stretch to say, may have had a substantially positive effect on his performance late in his career.
So what about Duquette’s other moves as GM in Boston? It was Duquette who brought in Derek Lowe and Jason Varitek in one of the great heists in recent baseball trades; for those of you who don’t know, the Seattle Mariners traded Lowe and Varitek to Boston for the likes of Heathcliff Slocumb. Slocumb would pitch a grand total of 98 innings as a Mariner, have an ERA of 4.97, a 2-9 record, and 13 saves in 84 appearances. It was Duquette who traded Carl Pavano (one of his draft picks) and Tony Armas to the Expos for Pedro Martinez, the same Martinez who would amass 117 wins, post a 2.52 ERA, earn a 47.6 WAR rating, and win two Cy Young awards in seven seasons in Boston. Ironically this was the second time that Duquette had, for all intents and purposes, stolen Martinez as a GM. He had brought him to Montreal from the Dodgers for Delino DeShields.
His free agent signings: Manny Ramirez, Johnny Damon, Tim Wakefield, Hanley Ramirez, Jamie Moyer, and Anibal Sanchez. Ramirez, Damon, and Wakefield are some of the most successful Red Sox players certainly of the era, but were also a part of the 2004 team that won the World Series. There is no doubt that Duquette made a mistake in trading Moyer away for Darren Bragg, but he recognized the pitcher’s talent. Ramirez and Sanchez never played for the Red Sox, but were the centerpieces of an Epstein trade with the Marlins that brought Josh Beckett and Mike Lowell to Boston.
Some of the best decisions are based in inaction. Duquette decided not to resign, then alienated, Mo Vaughn. Instead the slugger signed a 6-year $80 million contract, at the time the largest in baseball, with the Anaheim Angels. He would only play 4 of those 6 seasons in the Majors, and only 2 of them with the Angels. In his first year with the Angels, his average would drop from .337 to .281, his on-base percentage (OBP) from .402 to .358, and his slugging percentage (SLG) from .591 to .508.
All of this being said, Duquette did have some obvious shortcomings. While he was the one who drafted Nomar Garciaparra, Carl Pavano, Kevin Youkilis, Adam Everett, David Eckstein, Justin Duchscherer, and Shea Hillenbrand, those were the cream of an eight-year crop. He passed on players such as Roy Halladay, CC Sabathia, and Chase Utley. Most of his top picks busted. He could have done better in the drafts, but there also seemed to be some pressure in Boston that directed some of his picks.
Dan Duquette, like all GMs, is not without his share of mistakes in retrospect. With the record that he does have, however, I am shocked that it took a team 9 years to give him another chance at building a team. Baltimore may have been the perfect fit for him. He does not spend money on many foolish endeavors. Drafting knowledge and tools are greatly improved, where he did have some hits. It is clear that he is skilled at evaluating talent, and being in an environment a little less stressful than pre-2004 Boston will mean that Duquette may be able to improve upon the people skills that alienated so many in the Boston clubhouse and media.
Duquette will have to take some more risks, something he did not do too much of in Boston, because there is no other way for a team that is stuck in a division with the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, and even the Tampa Bay Rays now, to compete. One things for sure though, the Orioles have a man at the helm who has a legacy, and unlike so many players, has a chance to build a new one in Camden Yards.